Documentary on the science and technology behind Lance’s seven tour wins.
Watch Free Sports - Free Sports Online - Free Streaming TV
Documentary on the science and technology behind Lance’s seven tour wins.
Copyright © 2012 · Copyblogger Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in
@flugtager hahaha, damn man…that was awesome.
hell yes! go Lance!
all it takes is a fruit fly..
what state and roads is he on in the last part of thsi vid? what a ride!!
@hghepo stop spreading lies you hater
@u368 It seems your life is centered on discrediting Lance Armstrong. I hope I will not immerse myself in the personal hell of obsession and conspiracy theories that constitues your life by commenting on this. My sneaking suspicion is that you would be devastated if Lance truly did test positive (not some backroom photocopied forms from Le’Equipe) for your life would lose its purpose. I blow my nose in your general direction and at your regurgitated conjecture.
@KelferMookie Marion Jones was framed by police investigation, not by testing!
@u368 Marion Jones was framed
Now they need to update those videos with the blood doping technic used by Lance under the control of Dr. Ferrari.
Thanks Landis to come clean
@petresnotlosingit totally agreed this guy watches all the Lance Armstrong videos and the dumps all over them u368 needs to grow the fuck up at see what a hero Lance really is
drugs alone will not ensure you to win 7 consecutive titles in the most difficult bike race in a not so friendly environment,,,,,,
that fixed gear> what frame is it? is it in production?
@u368
What’s your point in pointing this old news out. Nothing was done by either. So, we wait for more ambiguous and misleading dribble from (who’s next?).
So you agree with WADA which approved LNDD finding… you have a choice to do between UCI (tests reults cannot be used to sanction Lance) or WADA by Pound was in favor of a sanction.
Please let us know.
He would have been caught like Marion Jones who was 2 more times tested than Lance. Testing are easily defeated. When Lance was caught in 99, UCI covered the case, to put down the cancer “survivor” would have been bad for their business especially after Festina.
When EPO was found later in 6 +2 of his 99 samples, UCI burried the case for lack of A samples, but logic is that 2 B positive of different samples are more reliable than A+B of one sample. His 2009 blood values show doping too.
@u368 Why are you repeatedly doubting and smearing Lance? Maybe you should look past his victories and see what he has done for literally millions of people around the world. Do you doubt him because you were too lazy as a kid to try and be like him or are you just always this grumpy? Grow the fuck up and let him do what he wants to do. If he really is and was doping, he would have been caught by now.
Your xenophobia is most worst than the hate of dopers like Armstrong.
Excerpt Frankie Andreu’s dairy of 1999 TDF about the rest day where Lance proclamed he had no TUE on that TDF
“Ironically the first two doping questions came from two American journalists. ”
Of course Lance’s transformation from a non-climber on Dauphine Libere just after Festina scandal was ewtremely suspicious, everyone can recognize the EPO effect on such incredible improvement
@u368
Still, you speak of innuendos and tabloid ballyhoo. The entire world, including me, knew of the “skin cream” issue in the first week of the 1999 tour. This kind of issue comes up weekly in the tour but 99% of the time it is not even flagged. Cancer survivor wins the prologue and the French open-up empty cans of worms, just like you.
FAIL again, 2 times.
You can find wada report (response to UCI report) on their website. WADA was not born in 1999 so they can have authority on that doping case, it’s only a UCI case which bribed by a paiement of $500.000 had already covered Lance corticosteroid positive test.
Moreover Lance’s 99 samples can be retested in any lab again, AFLD proposed it when Lance announced his comeback, identification of samples can be checked by DNA too. Lance refused because he knows he used EPO.
@u368
No, they didn’t find it real, nor does it even matter because the findings cannot be verified. That is exactly why WADA did not pursue the issue. Check your facts!
WADA agrees that LNDD findings of EPO inside Lance’s samples were real… so at least 2 governing bodies (french sport minister and WADA) make your statement wrong.
Are you able to check a bit your points before writting them?
@u368
Like most things in life, those testimonials were given to further personal agendas, however deranged they may be and cannot be coupled with any hard proof, proof any governing body consider credible, of doping on Lance Armstrong’s part over the last 10 years.
Your rantings are merely echos of this absurdity.
@u368
If those were conclusive, with representitive counter samples, then you would have a point. Unfortunately, as in all your post, you do not. I agree with the UCI and WADA; no irrefutable proof?; then stop wasting our time.
Could you explain us why Lance was not able to have a hematocrit of 50 as he did in his other TDF?
BTW lad did nt known the name of tested samples, only ressiot matched the names with UCI and Armstrong’s help.
About spiking samples with EPO you shoud read on velocitynation Ashenden interview.
Everything tend to prove that Lance doped: testimonies (Andreu, O’Reilly, Landis,…), facts (EPO samples,, US postal doping materials, actovegin, …) and a lot of clues like his 2009 blood values!
The test for EPO is not a reliable test. The lab knew whose samples they tested. The analysts confused the ID’s of the samples. Many samples were spiked with EPO to determine matrix effects! It is feasible that only the spiked ones were positive but we will never know. Consider the veracity of the test results and integrity of the testing organization. The consequences of Armstrong being caught are so direr it is ludicrous to even consider using performance enhancing drugs.